Hello Everyone! nag lodge ako ng TV application ko last Dec 22 then received an email from VFS then from embassy a day after. I was expecting po na makuha ang resuly ng 3rd week pa ng Jan.2016. but to my surprise, last Jan06,2016 naka receive ako ng email from embassy. Unfortunately REFUSED po ang visab application ko. masyadong vague yung reason (see below).
My Questions are :
can I still reapply? if yes, ilang months after?
Ano pam pong documents ang dapat kong I-submit?\
may cases po ba na after 1 month nag apply uli tas na approve?
may malaking factor po ba ang mga visas? kasi lahat ng na visit ko prior to my application non visa required countries eh.
Im starting to lose hope pero Im still being positive. wala naman ako kamaganak dun puro friends lang. I just really want to go to Australia for vacay.
Eto po mga na submit ko :
ITR,COE, Bank Statement, PAssports, Photo 2x2,NSO BC
I will appreciate any comments or suggestions etc.
Thanks
Eto po yung nakalagay :
After careful consideration of all the information you have provided, I was not satisfied that
you met the relevant criteria for the grant of this visa as set out in Australian migration law.
The attached Decision Record provides more detailed information about this decision and the
applicant(s) it applies to.
Whilst the applicant has supplied relevant information relating to their personal circumstances
in the Philippines, the documentation supplied by the applicant has failed to demonstrate that
the applicant has significant ties to the Philippines that would induce them to return home
within the validity of their visa nor would it be reasonable for them to be away from the
commitments and responsibilities that they have demonstrated for the purposes of a holiday.
Therefore, I give no weight to asset ownership, business ties or cultural ties as evidence that
the applicant intends a genuine visit to Australia and cannot consider these ties as factors that
will induce the applicant to depart Australia within the validity of their visa.
It is necessary to provide adequate evidence with every application in order to satisfy decision
makers that the applicant’s situation in their home country is such that they would not
potentially seek recourse to unlawful employment onshore or to seek to remain onshore. On
this occasion the applicant has failed to do this. Whilst I have given careful consideration to
the reason stated for the visit, I find that the stated purpose travel does not outweigh the
various concerns associated with the application as outlined above. The applicant has not
provided sufficient evidence, in accordance with policy to demonstrate that their true
intention is only for a genuine visit to Australia. I am therefore not satisfied that the applicant
meets cl600.211(c).
Decision
As the applicant does not meet clause 600.211(c), I find that you do not meet the criteria for
the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.
Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa
lodged at Manila.