<blockquote rel="reeyz24">Question po sa mga nagpaassess sa CPAA. Hingi lang ng advise which is better na magsubmit for assessment.. online or by post?
Thanks</blockquote>
<blockquote rel="pangrom0529"><blockquote rel="Dayanski">Hi @reeyz24 sorry for the late response. As long as your job experience is relevant to the nominated occupation and your COE discloses the minimum information required by CPAA, it will be counted. Unfortunately, what happened to me is CPAA did not recognise my first two years of experience from a firm in Makati maybe because they failed to reach what CPAA needed to see (e.g. job description). Luckily the succeeding years counted and they considered exactly five years. However keep in mind that CPAA's assessment on employment is only their opinion. The case officer assigned to you would have the last say on that regard.</blockquote>
Hi @Dayanski and @reeyz24, just my thoughts, whatever the result on your employment assessment that the assessing body awarded is the same points that the case officer will follow. there is a disclaimer in the assessment letter but the case officer is not in the position to negate the result as he is not an expert in the duties and responsibilities of an accountant. cguro, basic knowledge, oo. it is for this reason, that with the introduction of EOI and skillselect, the department passed the liability and obligation to the experts in the field.
although, i dont know if there are cases in this site na nagkwento about incidents where the case officer lowered their points. </blockquote>
You hit it right in the sweet spot..
The CO is not an expert in determining whether your work experience fits that of what is required of a 221111 skilled migrant applicant. The CO is a generalist whereas the assessor in say CPAA is the specialist... ๐
Well done @pangrom0529...