Here are my comments from the officer po:
I have reviewed your Competency Demonstration Report application, and advise the following shortcomings in your submission:
• the name on your passport and degree differ from your name on your letters of reference, please provide evidence of the use of both names;
• the submitted degree qualifications are equivalent to an Australian three year Bachelor of Technology. To be assessed equivalent to a four year Bachelor of Engineering you have to provide evidence of passing the Professional Regulation Commission’s Licensure Examinations. Without this document you will not be assessed as a Professional Engineer;
• the Career Episodes have not been written according to the template. A Career Episode is not about the acquisition of engineering skills and knowledge but about the application of skills and knowledge on one specific project;
• the account of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) you have provided is unsatisfactory. There is no evidence of current CPD (post January 2011);
• the summary statement of evidence for the competency elements is unsatisfactory. Please provide a summary of the engineering competency related to the Career Episode.