<blockquote class="Quote" rel="kaidenMVH">
<blockquote class="Quote" rel="Pinoy_Imphotep">I'm wondering papano inaassess ni vetassess ang employment history. Will they only focus on doing the review on the absolute years nung employment background sa resume ng isang applicant kung saan yung related task/duties or occupation lang ang related or similar to the nominated occupation na pinapaassess? I've raised this question kasi I might have over weighted the years assignment sa employment on testing thru visabureau and i'm a bit confused if whats best number of years ang iaassign kung the whole history of employment ba since graduating the bachelor degree including PH work experience and iaasign or just the years from the beginning of overseas employment.
Although lets say if my nominated occupation is 133112 project builder, then having a degree and license in architecture back in PH with all the design and site supervision experience & tasks/duties, but when it comes to overseas naging purely focused na lang sa site supervision. icoconsider ba ni vetassess ang PH experience? Kasi if considered, it will boost and could attract more to achieve positive outcome and fattens the nominated occupation as qualified.</blockquote>
vetassess will assess based on the last 10 years of employment from the date you submitted your documents sa vetassess. as long as you have the supporting documents, kahit san pa yun location ng work mo they will review it. they will take out your first 1 year of employment as a qualifying period to meet the skill level required for the nominated skill. meaning parang sa basketball rookie ka pa lang so hindi pa considered as "skilled' yun 1st year mo. that's will leave you with 9 years but still ok kasi it will still give you max points sa employment. our license won't have any bearing pagdating sa employment assessment kasi they will base it sa duties and responsibilities na ilalagay mo for each job/company na kasama sa employment history mo. maybe it will have bearing sa education qualification. That's why it is important na kapag nagpa assess you have to decide alin ba talaga yun gusto mo na ipa assess. proj builder?archi draftsperson?construction man? kasi kung sa isang company nilagay mo job responsibility mo as proj builder, then sa isang company nilagay mo architecture technician ka, they will count it as separate and you might not get the max points. but because as project builder you might have done drafting and preparation of drawings, you can change your designation to architectural coordinator and put you duties and responsibilities as that of architectural technician, then yu can get the max number of years and points sa employment. </blockquote>
@kaidenMVH Maraming salamat sa input mo bro. Kasi in my case (overseas exp), i was more on project site administration (lead consultant ng project 3rd from the highest ranking staff sa mga nakita kong organization chart sa projects na naassigned ako). Madalang ako nagddrafting kc i was more on review and approval ng submittals ng main contractor prior to execution at site ensuring all containment are in accordance with the project specs. And I've been doing these tasks/duties for about 88 months or 7.3 years in abroad (112 months or 9.3 years kung kasali PH works minus the 1st year) and also liable whatever may be the outcome upon my review and approval especially dun sa mga companies na employed ako kung saan walang requirement for final approval of any colleague or supervisor higher than me kundi ako yung final approval and it goes straight to the main contractor for their implementation. If something really bad happened at site and proven that it was all due to my review & approval upon overlooking some points that must have been considered and incorporated, the client's gun barrel can automatically be pointed at me. hehehe basta parang ganun yung importance ng naging role ko. I doubt I would be given a positive outcome if i push an arch draftsman kasi madalang nga lang ang activity ko sa drafting kaya hesitant ako in assigning draftsman occupation.